Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Blend of Lignicellulosic Materials for Reducing Sugar Production: Screening of Significant Process Factors

Main Article Content

Bathlomew Chukwudi Amadi
Philomena Kañulia Igbokwe
Chijioke Elijah Onu


The screening of the process parameters on the enzymatic hydrolysis of a blend of two lignocellulosic materials - corn cob (CC) and deseeded fluted pumpkin fruit (DFPF) using Trichoderma reesei was the focus of the present study. Four process parameters – time, temperature, substrate blend ratio and pH were screened for statistical significance using a 4 x 4 matrix of Graeco-Latin square design of experiment. The reducing sugar yield was determined using the dinitrosalisylic acid (DNS) method and maximum reducing sugar yield of 57.92mg/ml obtained in 2days at 40oC, blend ratio of 0.2:0.8 (CC:DFPF) and pH 5.5. Result of the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) obtained showed that with 3 degrees of freedom and 6 residual degree of freedom at 95% confidence level (i.e. 0.05 significance), time, temperature and substrate blend ratio significantly affected the enzymatic hydrolysis process whereas the effect of pH was not significant. However, only time was significant at 99% confidence level (0.01 significance) while temperature, substrate blend ratio and pH were not significant. This study has highlighted the significant factors among the process variables in emzymatic hydrolysis of a blend of CC and DFPF.

Enzymatic hydrolysis, screening, Graeco-Latin square, corn cob, fluted pumpkin, lignocellulosic materials, reducing sugar.

Article Details

How to Cite
Amadi, B. C., Igbokwe, P. K., & Onu, C. E. (2020). Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Blend of Lignicellulosic Materials for Reducing Sugar Production: Screening of Significant Process Factors. Asian Journal of Chemical Sciences, 8(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajocs/2020/v8i419048
Original Research Article


Nagenderan S, Rajamundi P, Chandran M, Gopinath KP. Bioethanol from Moringa olefira and Pithecellobium dulce leaf: Production and characterisation. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilisation and Environmental Effects; 2019.

Madu EO, Nwabanne JT, Onu CE, Ifeanyi CEU. Kinetic study of dilute acid hydrolysis of cowpea seed husk for production of Glucose. Journal of Materials Science Research and Reviews. 2019;4(4):1-10.

El-Gendy NS, Madian HR, Abu Amr SS. Design and optimization of a process for sugarcane molasses fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae using response surface methodology. International Journal of Microbiology; 2013. Article ID 815631.

Rattanapan A, Limtong S, Phisalaphong M. Ethanol production by repeated batch and continuous fermentations of blackstrap molasses using immobilized yeast cells on thin-shell silk cocoons. Applied Energy. 2011;88(12):4400–4404.

Ort WJ, McMahan CM. Biorefinery development for advanced biofuels from a sustainable array of biomass feedstocks: Survey of recent biomass conversions research from agricultural research service. Bioenerg. Res. 2016;9:430-446.

Adewuyi YG, Deshame VG. Intensification of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose using high-frequency ultrasound: An investigation of the effects of process parameters on glucose yield. Energy Fuels. 2015;29:4998-5006.

Kucharska K, Rybarczyk P, Holowacz I, Lukajtis R. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials as substrate for fermentation process. Molecules. 2018;23:2937.

Satari B, Karimi K, Kumar R. Cellulose solvent-based pretreatment for enhanced second generation biofuel production: A review. Sustainable Energy Fuels. 2019;3: 11-62.

Adeyi O. Proximate composition of some agricultural wastes in Nigeria and their potential use in the production of activated carbon. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management. 2010;14(1): 55-58

Alam MZ, Elgharbawy AA, Moniruzzaman M, Kabbashi NA, Jamal P. Screening of factors affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of empty fruit bunches in aqueous ionic liquid and locally produced system. International Journal of Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering. 2016;10(7).

Xiao W, Yin W, Xia S, Ma P. The study of factors affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose after ionic liquid pretreatment. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012;87:2019– 2023.

Ye Z, Berson E. Factors affecting cellulose hydrolysis based on inactivation of adsorbed enzymes. Bioresource Technology. 2014;167:582–586.

Fenila F, Shastri Y. Optimisation control of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Resource-efficient Technologies. 2016;2:S96-S104.

Oke MA, Annuar MSN, Simarani K. Mixed feedstock approach to lignocellulosic ethanol production: Prospects and limitations. Bioenerg. Res. 2016;9:1189-1203.

Mansouri A, Rihani R, Laoufi N, Özkan M. Production of bioethanol from a mixture of agricultural feedstocks: Biofuels characterization. Fuel. 2016;185:612–621

Woods DC, Lewis SM. Design of experiments for screening. In: R Ghanem, D Higdon and H Owhadi (ed). Handbook of uncertainty quantification. Springer, Cham; 2017.

Antony J. Design of experimens for scientists and engineers (Second edition). Elsevier; 2014.

Graeco-Latin Square Design. In: The concise encyclopaedia of statistics. Springer, New York, NY; 2008.

Zivorad R, Lazic. Design of experiment in chemical engineering. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA Weinheim; 2004.

Okpe EC, Asadu CO, Onu CE. Statistical analysis for orange G adsorption using kola nut shell activated carbon. Journal of the Chinese Advanced Materials Society. 2018;1-15. DOI: 10.1080/22243682.2018.1534607

Borysiak S. Influence of polymorphs on the polypropylene crystalisation. J. Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;133:281-289. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-013-3109-0

Ayeni AD, Adeayo OA, Oresegun OM, Oladimeji TE. Compositional analysis of of lignocellulosic materials: Evaluation of an economically viable method suitable for woody and non-woody biomass. American Journal of Engineering Research. 2015; 4(4):14-19.

Amoah M, Assan F, Dadzie PK. Aboveground biomass carbon storage and fuel value of Bambusa vulgaris, Oxynanteria abbyssimica and Bambusa vulgaris var. vitata plantation plantation in the Bobiri forest reserve of Ghana. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 2020;39(2):113-136.

Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D. Determination of ash in biomass: Lab analytical procedure. NREL/TP-510-42622 National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO; 2008. Available:http://nrel.gov/docs/gen/fy08/42622.pdf

Saliu BK, Sani A. Bioethanol potentials of corn cob hydrolysed using cellulases of Aspergillus niger and Penicillium decumbens. EXCLI J. 2012;11:468–479.

Jain A, Jain R, Jain S. Basic techniques in Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Biology: principles and techniques. Springer Protocols Handbooks, Springer Science + Business media, LLC, Part of Springer Nature, New York; 2020. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9861-6_42

Alvarez C, Reyes-Sosa FM, Diez B. Enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass from wood. Microbial Biotechnoloy. 2016;9(2): 149-156.

Dean A, Voss D, Draguljic D. Design and analysis of experiments (Second edition). Springer International Publishing, Cham; 2017.

Iheanacho CO, Nwabanne JT, Onu CE. Optimum process parameters for activated carbon production from rice husk for phenol adsorption. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2019; 36(6):1-11. DOI: 10.9734/CJAST/2019/v36i630264

Sen B. Determination of factors affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of low severity acid-steam pretreated agro-residue. Journal of Chinese Chemical Society. 2014;6:809-813.

Egbuna SO, Igwilo CN, Onyekwelu CS. Saccharification of melon seed shell to yield reducing sugar via enzymatic hydrolysis. Explorematic Journal of Innovative Engineering and Technology. 2018;2(1).